{"id":1075,"date":"2022-07-19T15:19:59","date_gmt":"2022-07-19T15:19:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/donahoekearney.com\/?post_type=results&p=1075"},"modified":"2025-08-08T20:57:08","modified_gmt":"2025-08-08T20:57:08","slug":"construction-worker-settles-workers-compensation-case-in-dc","status":"publish","type":"results","link":"https:\/\/donahoekearney.com\/results\/construction-worker-settles-workers-compensation-case-in-dc\/","title":{"rendered":"DC Workers’ Comp Case Settles for Construction Worker"},"content":{"rendered":"

DC Workers\u2019 Compensation Win \u2013 Benefits Awarded for Both Original and Related Injuries<\/strong><\/h2>\n

After a serious work accident left this construction worker unable to return to work after an injury to their right knee, our client needed their worker’s compensation benefits to pay for their medical treatment and recovery.<\/p>\n

After arthroscopic surgery, a knee replacement, and a revision of the right knee replacement (the surgeon took out the original replacement knee and put in another one), our client was unlikely to ever work in construction again.<\/p>\n

The constant pain in his right knee meant they constantly favored the left knee, putting increased stress and weight while standing, walking, or even getting in and out of their vehicle.<\/p>\n

The added stress meant eventually, the left knee started bothering them – without any injury or illness. Their treating orthopedic surgeons injected the left knee to try to control the symptoms, which were due to favoring the right leg.<\/p>\n

Naturally, the worker’s comp insurance doctor said problems with the left knee were from old age, degenerative, arthritis, weight – you name it. And of course, the worker’s compensation adjuster and the insurance company denied providing medical treatment for the left knee.<\/p>\n

After hiring experienced D.C. workers compensation attorney Frank R. Kearney<\/a><\/strong><\/span>, we submitted the medical evidence necessary for the judge to rule that the left knee symptoms were caused by favoring the originally injured right knee and the insurance company was liable for paying for medical of both knees.<\/p>\n

Workers’ Compensation Judge Rules In Injured Worker’s Favor<\/h4>\n

A food service manager working with a national company that provides food to university and hospital cafeterias in the DC area severely injured his back after lifting a case of supplies at work. Like a lot of managers, his job is hands-on and physical, especially when employees would not show up for work or deliveries would come in unexpectedly. Every day he had to lift and carry 50 pounds or more. And as anyone in food service knows, this is a production-oriented job so it had to be done quickly.<\/p>\n

After lifting the case, he felt immediate pain in his back and did the right thing by going to get it checked out. Unfortunately, after several visits with an orthopedic surgeon and trying various conservative treatment options, he was still in pain. An MRI revealed he had a herniated disc in his back.<\/p>\n

The herniated disc caused nerve damage to his leg, and he had radiculopathy<\/a>,<\/strong><\/span> numbness, and tingling. These are all common symptoms of a herniated disk.<\/p>\n

The shooting pain, numbness, and tingling that went down his leg also caused him to fall when the leg would give away, and his treating orthopedic surgeon recommended surgery.<\/p>\n

The Insurance Company Denied Authorization For The Knee Surgery<\/h4>\n

Unfortunately, the worker\u2019s compensation insurance company delayed authorizing the surgery. They got an 80-year-old doctor in Louisiana who had never seen the patient or reviewed any imaging studies (and probably had not performed the surgery in years) to write a report saying the surgery was not reasonable or necessary. The insurance company also hired a well-known insurance doctor to conduct an independent medical exam, despite the doctor not having experience with these types of surgeries. All this was used by the insurance company to say that he did not need the surgery.<\/p>\n

We Filed For A Formal Hearing To Get Our Client What He Needed<\/h4>\n

We requested a hearing to get the injured worker the surgery he needed. We were eventually able to convince the insurance company to authorize the surgery, but during the waiting period the numbness, tingling, and weakness got worse and his leg gave out on him when he was walking to his truck on his driveway. He fell and hit his knee about one year after his original back injury.<\/p>\n

The insurance denied that the knee injury was related to his work accident, despite the numbness, tingling, and weakness being caused by the herniated disc. So we worked with his doctors to make sure he had the medical evidence indicating that the herniated disc caused the nerve damage that caused him to fall.<\/p>\n

And the worker’s compensation insurance went to another well-known insurance doctor to refute this, but the judge saw right through it.<\/p>\n

A big part of the judge’s decision was that the knee injury was caused by the back injury and that he needed the denied medical treatment. The judge believed our client when he testified about the problems he had as a result of the original injury and she found him to be a credible and convincing witness.<\/p>\n